Friday, February 04, 2011

NEST playing away on 9-11 -- updated

Originally posted 17th May 2010:

There is so much disinformation out there. Don't be surprised by this. We are in a CORPORATE WAR ECONOMY at the moment. A great part of the spending of your hard-earned tax-funds is they have to keep feeding You The People a compartmentalised and deceptive cover story so that you will never actually know what they're are doing with your tax dollars. This is so that you won't DEPOSE them. So that you won't demand a FREE PLANET.

I don't know if I'm a big fan of this Dmitri Khalezov' 150 KT nukes brought down WTC 1 & 2 theory yet, but supporting evidence may have arrived in the form of this entry on the 9-11 TIMELINE that suggests that the U.S. Department of Energy’s nuclear bomb squad, the Nuclear Emergency Search Team (NEST), were out of the country for a rather serious exercise in Europe called Jackal Cave involving upwards of 500 personnel and 63 aircraft looking for and disarming a nuclear device ... NEST flew back to the U.S.A. FIVE DAYS AFTER 9-11.

For me, this can be considered "smoking gun evidence" for the 150 KT underground nuclear demolition of WTC 1 and 2 scenario; this War of Terror tactic could be called, "While the cat's away, the mice can play."

September 5-15, 2001: Nuclear Bomb Squad Is Abroad for Exercise

The Department of Energy’s nuclear bomb squad, known as the Nuclear Emergency Search Team (NEST), is in Europe for an exercise called Jackal Cave. [Richelson, 2009, pp. 178; National Security Archive, 1/23/2009]

The unit was created in 1975 following a extortionist’s threat to detonate a nuclear device in Boston if not paid a ransom. Since then, the group has been responsible for evaluating nuclear threats and, if the threat is judged credible, by searching for and disabling a nuclear device. [Time, 1/8/1996]

This is the NEST’s first foreign deployment since 1998. Jackal Cave is a large exercise involving 500 personnel and 62 aircraft. The CIA and a special operations force are also involved in locating a mock nuclear device, which NEST would then disable. [National Security Archive, 1/23/2009] The exercise is canceled after the 9/11 attacks and the search team repatriated in the following days (see also October 11, 2001). [Swindon Advertiser, 8/30/2001; BBC News, 9/13/2001]

All Department of Energy participants and equipment are returned to the US within five days of the attacks. [Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, 2003]
[source HISTORY COMMONS]

I'd really like to hear an interview with ANY of the members of this team in light of the NUKES @ WTC issue and the timing of their absence from the U.S.A. - that'd be something of an eye opener.

February 4th 2011 update:
I've just found a brand-new podcast interview with Dmitri Khalezov on THE REAL DEAL with Jim Fetzer, dated January 21st 2011. This new interview contains additional Viktor Bout information, namely that he he was extradited from 'neutral' Bangkok for selling '3 mini nukes' and 'granit missile' to Osama Bin Laden for use on 9-11. What, you've never heard this '2nd truth'? It's all a GAME, never forget that.

In fact, here's the Abstract of a paper Running Title: Downward Acceleration of WTC 1 as its 'undamaged upper minority' fell through the 'pulverised lower majority', suggesting that there 'should have been' too much resistance from lower majority for the upper minority to be functional as a PILE DRIVER.

The roof line of the North Tower of the World Trade Center is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared. A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block. Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight. Since the lower section of the building was designed to support several times the weight of the upper block, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush the lower section of the building. Therefore the falling block could not have acted as a "pile driver." The downward acceleration of the upper block can be understood as a consequence of, not the cause of, the disintegration of the lower section of the building.

6 comments:

David Howard said...

The FBI uses polygraphs to eliminate suspects.

Google "Quadri-Track ZCT"

Anne said...

Okay; well, I am glad that you've (at least) furthered the knowledge of Dimitri (911thology). I know Dimitri, enough to call him a friend (even if only an online-friend), and he is the man-- the ONLY man, who has finally answered all of my questions about 9-11. Your info about NEST has also served to bolster HIS arguments, that this could only have happened as Dimitri has purported.
Now, tell the world!!

Andrew Johnson said...

Hello,
For a detailed look at the so-called "Howden Moor Incident", with audio interviews of witness, maps, photos and document scans, please see this:

http://www.checktheevidence.com/Sheffield/

I hope you will do what the URL suggests.

Andrew Johnson said...

Sorry - last comment may have got messed up.

Dmitry can't explain:

1) Lack of damage to bathtub
2) People levitated but not burned
3) Only 1 pane of a double-glazed glass unit broken
4) Banker's trust building
5) Inverted cars
6) Hurricane Erin closest to NYC at 8am on 911

7) Alaskan Magnetometer data from 911

8) No appreciable siesmic signature from tower's destruction

In correspondence I had with him, he ignored or denied most of this evidence.

Please see http://tinyurl.com/911ftb if you want to understand what I am saying.

Or see http://www.drjudywood.com/ and
http://tinyurl.com/911qtam

Thanks

Mike Philbin said...

Andrew,

your 'Howden Moor Incident' SHEFFIELD url (above) is broken. Please repost an URL that works and I'll delete your above broken comment.

Mike

Anne said...

Andrew;
I am fairly sure, now, that you have not seen all of Dimitri's videos or articles. Check out his youtube postings of ALL 26 vidoes, from his page: 911thology.

Perhaps, after watching the videos, you will comprehend all of this?

Also, I have read Dimitri's BOOK (which has not been yet published) and, so, perhaps I have a leg up on you as far as more info? Still, I did not become friends with Dimitri until AFTER I was so very impressed by his knowledge and his ability to answer ALL of my questions.

For instance, I have seen the ORIGINAL seismic charts; yes, there were some accounts that ended up being changed from the original data. Maybe you should check this out?