DMITRI KHALEZOV'S CASE FOR A NUCLEAR DEMOLITION OF WTC 1, 2 and 7

DMITRI A KHALEZOV'S CASE FOR A NUCLEAR DEMOLITION OF WTC 1, 2 and 7

The most important thing is to bring the proper case to the court. What I could offer as an eye-witness and also partly as a person who have a certain experience with the law system in general:

1) you can use my claims as an eye-witness testimony. I am indeed a former officer of the Special Control Service of the former USSR and I indeed could prove it. In this capacity I could testify that the fact of the WTC nuclear demolition scheme was known to me before 9/11.

2) I could introduce to you more people who will testify before the court by claiming the same thing. Either in regard to the WTC or in regard to the nuclear demolition scheme of the UN building.

3) You can use a variety of pre-9/11 dictionaries compared with post-9/11 dictionaries to prove a fact that there has been a manipulation attempt with 'ground zero' definitions. You can prove also that during first few days 'ground zero' was used in low-case letters and in this capacity it was by no means a Proper Noun, but rather a standard Civil Defense designation.

4) You can bring independent medical experts who will testify before the court that leukemia in adults could only occur because of two main reasons: being subjected to ionizing radiation, or being subjected for extended periods of time to inhaling benzene vapors. Since at 'ground zero' there were no 'benzene vapors' that one could inhale for years, there would be logical to presume that ground zero responders suffer their leukemia on account of ionizing radiation.

5) Independent medical analysis of the victim’s tissues could be brought before the court to confirm the above.

6) Demolition experts could be brought to the court and explain to the court that the way the WTC-1 and -2 collapsed (and especially the WTC-7) had nothing to do with the "planes"

7) Specialists in underground nuclear explosions could be brought before the court and testify to the usual effects of pulverization caused by the pressure of evaporated gases

8) Physicists could be brought to the court to explain that the pulverization of structural steel is impossible unless the steel was subjected to a tremendous pressure that could only be developed by an underground nuclear explosion.

9) eye-witnesses who would testify about the molten metal, and most importantly – about molten rock, as well as about underground cavities;

10) firefighting experts who will testify about the “longest-lasting underground fires” – especially those under the WTC-7;

11) If you want also to touch the no-planes argument (which I think is necessary to complete the case, but some people might thing that touching this subject might devaluate the rest of the claims) you could additionally call the following experts:

- military experts who will explain that armor-piercing shells are traditionally made from solid tungsten or from solid depleted uranium and never from hollow aluminum and confirm that aluminum can not penetrate steel by definition;

- experts in physics who will confirm the same thing as above;

- experts in aviation who will testify that the passenger planes could not fly at their full cruise speeds at the altitude shown;

- pilots who fly commercial aircraft who will confirm the above and also explain that piloting planes in the shown conditions while targeting the Towers is impossible;

- pilots who will explain that the penetration of the Pentagon is impossible and could not have been performed by the plane neither from the point of penetrating capability, nor from the point of the flight trajectory;

- experts in mobile communications who will testify to the court that using cellular phones while aboard the planes is impossible as alleged in the case;

- experts in cinematography who will prove before the court that all videos showing the “planes” are false.

If you make the case properly and do not miss any important detail and none of the expert betrays the cause in the last moment, you will certainly win the case, or, at least, you will put the US Justice in such a shit, that it would never be able to wash its face forever. [source Dmitri A Khalezov, Special Control Service commissioned officer]