Saturday, February 11, 2012
the sun is an interstellar messaging device
you'd probably have expected me to have illustrated this post with a big picture of the sun from NASA showing some enormous coronal mass ejection or something radiating out of this solar communication device. But that's not how my mind works. You've just seen a short movie of an artificial whale making artificial waves in an artificial ocean. You'll understand the make-it-real relevance of this 'illusion' or you won't.
Now, onto the substance of this blogpost, "The sun is an interstellar messaging device," pretty strong claim but hear me out.
Since I posted about Cleve Backster - Quantum Biocommunication - Primary Perception I've become somewhat obsessed with the implications and the ramifications of such earth-shattering research. Sure, plants reflect their environment. Sure, DNA taken from a donor reacts when you put that donor in an emotional state, no matter how distant the two samples.
But wait, is such quantum biocommunication a one-way deal?
What is the sample taken from the donor could affect the donor? Well, we are leaving samples of our DNA all over the place all the time when our skin sheds or our hair falls out or... you get the idea. Is whatever happens to those 'spillages of our life essence' able to be picked up by the donor, no matter how distant? Are we connected with all the places we've deposited our DNA throughout our lives?
And that made me think ... we are all stardust.
Think very seriously about that. All that atoms that make up the complex orchestra of our DNA were formed in the heart of our cooling star in its youth, our sun. Since time is stretched at the ultra-gravitational realm, are our atoms still connected to the sun's influence? Or conversely, can we emotionally COMMUNICATE with our sun. And if that's the case, can we use this instantaneous biocommunication to communicate with other stars in our galaxy and can we use that instant connectivity to communicate with other galaxies in our universe, etc and on and on...
I mean, I know the frequencies will be different; in DNA they're formed by the complex strcutures of atomic interaction across our parent-donated double helix: in the sun they're formed by the purer tones of hydrogen and helium and all the other heavy elements of our parent star. But the important thing is, "We're still samples of our original parent," and that sub-space connection, as evidenced by Backster's research might still be active. Hey, you don't even need a SPIRIT or a SOUL to do these experiments; you don't have to believe in God of follow any Earth Spirit Cult or anything. This is just a physical thing. You just need the bio-organic connection of the aeons, that touch of the 'other world' of our 'multi-dimensional atomic linkage' for this to work.
In fact, it's more likely that the captured HYDROGEN BONDS within the DNA double-helix are more important than the ACGT base paris of the organic material in our cells. It's the HYDROGEN that sings the songs of the stars, after all.
I'd like you, the near-300 followers of this blog, to do a test as soon as you receive mention of this new blogpost, I want you to focus all your creative attention on an image of the blazing sun sitting in space erupting and roiling in its super-heated way, "I want you to concentrate on this image in your mind and send the sun a positive message concerning your idea of a Free Planet," that can therefore be broadcast INSTANTANEOUSLY to all the stars of our Galaxy and by interconnectivity to all the galaxies in our universe.
This act can be like our COMING HOME PARTY.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

2 comments:
you are QUESTIONING:
[quote]What is the sample taken from the donor could affect the donor?[/quote]
I can tell you this: how about [b][i]VOODOO[/i][/b]? Are YOU forgetting that this ANCIENT AFRICAN RELIGION that in fact USES the "biocomunication" that you speak of (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_African_Vodun)
Strange how we today "discard" [i]ancient knowledge[/i] as pure madness or [i]"trying to explain the phenomena with their lack of knowledge"[/i] and yet, our HIGHER KNOWLEDGE leads us into the EXACT SAME CONCLUSION!
Voodoo, yeah - thanks.
:)
Post a Comment