Galaxy Z8-GND-5296 is VERY FAR AWAY, and that's all it means.
In fact, it means the LIGHT HAS DEGRADED over 13 billion years ago since it began its journey, the wavelength of its light has lengthened towards the Microwave end of the electromagnetic spectrum.
And don't tell me that CMB or Cosmic Microwave Background is your only evidence of a Big Bang ... that makes it a bunkum theory. The reason I'm so cocky and forthright on this issue is BECAUSE I TURNED PHYSICS ON ITS HEAD - my HC Unit theory states that 'light is a local-to-global i.e. expanding, FILL-IN event of THE WHOLE UNIVERSE settling a debt at the speed of c (because that's how the universe moves) like a game of TETRIS. We see a 'light beam' being emitted 13 billion years ago, but it has red-shifted with a value of 7.5. You see how amazing this statement is? The universe has PROPERTIES that are shown by the degradation of light over time.
This Big Bang-bunkum example of what a 7.5 red-shift might mean, from SkyNews but I have seen THE EXACT SAME PRESS RELEASE TEXT on several site, seems to imply that this means the further back in distance we look, the earlier the universe is.
NO PROOF AT ALL FOR THAT, sorry.
Science has to ADMIT that because of this 'light being a fill-in process' rather than a expulsive process, 'all light we see' in our Solar Sphere i.e. where the humans live, is LOCAL LIGHT that has not yet degraded, it's TOO NEW and hasn't had time to sssssttttttrrrrreeeeeeettcccccccch on out towards the microwaves end. The formation of light means that any we see here is BRAND NEW and the universe that transports it has not had time to degrade.
As shown by my 'experiment to measure tired light' the UNIVERSE gets older, over time, and the wavelength of its ripples changes. In fact, we may never see the extent of the universe because the light from galaxies older than 13 billion years old might have degraded to MUSH.
GRAVITY SUPPLEMENTAL: I would refrain from thinking within Science's CLEVER BOX of Conceptual Belief. They're as bad as Religious Leaders. They're a FAITH MACHINE incarnate.
Think outside their donated box, and you'll find that the classic Einstein heavy ball on a rubber sheet model of gravity is also fundamentally flawed. There is NO BALL pushing down on a sheet that represent the 'flatness' of uniform space, nor will there ever be.
1) space is not 'uniform' it is clumped, just saying a 'what if' is real doesn't mean you can go generate grant money to make weapons for the Corporate War Machine.
2) the PLANET that weighs down upon THE FLAT UNIVERSE means it is EXTRA-DIMENSIONAL to that universe! It is not a part of the universe. You get this? It is 'however far' above the universe. So, Science is either saying that atoms are extra-dimensional to gravity. Or they're not thinking this gravity-shit through...
Is in not far more likely that the 'sheet of space' BULGES indicating the presence of atoms? But then, it's still not a 'sheet of space' it's more like BUBBLE WRAP. But then the theory still doesn't go anywhere near explaining why the universe is clumped in SPECIFIC STRUCTURES or RESONANCES... why is the bubble wrap not uniform, what's the sonic driving mechanism for the arrangement of matter?
|vibrational sound patterns shown by sand on steel plate|