HC Unit - why is space so big? - matter so rare?
 |
BBC's HORIZON 2010 - who's afraid of a big black hole?
|
The physics breaks down.
It's as simple as that: there's still no GUT or Grand Unified Theory and, "We need some new ideas about how our universe works."
- Light gets tired i.e. red-shifts over long time spans.
- Space is so big and matter so rare across all the scales.
- Forces that are responsible for the biggest structures in our universe MUST be the same as the forces that create the tiniest structures.
Light gets tired i.e. red-shifts over long time spans:
the only thing supporting a Big Bang origin of the universe is red-shifted light, but, what iff, all the light we see in this Solar System is Local Light i.e. light that hasn't had a chance to degrade to red-shifted light. I suspect that light is 'refreshed' when its energy is absorbed and re-emitted. Only the old light from stars is truly red-shifted and shows how long it's travelled.
Space is so big and matter within so small across all the scales:
look at a galaxy, the matter involved is truly tiny
look at an atom, the matter involved is truly tiny
don't go stressing the importance of matter when it is such a small contributor to the overall picture. The upshot of this is that 'matter can not' be both the electromagnetic AND gravitational originator. Quantum and Gravity will never be found from this source.
Forces that are responsible for the biggest structures in our universe MUST be the same as the forces that create the tiniest structures.
something much larger, much more galactic must be going on, and I suspect it happens in the opposite direction to what Modern Physics is looking at it from. It goes something like this, "Forces that can sublimate an atom or a star or the hyper-mass gravitational source at the centres of most galaxies," are THE SAME FORCE. That of hidden vortices and extra-dimensional influence. There is no way a 'particle-led' Big Bang will result in these disparate subatomic/gravity forces. It makes no sense.
What makes more sense is that, "Everything in the universe happens in the same way, at various scales." Matter is a by-product of this. That's all that happened. Stop theorising and dot-watching, Physics, and start Universe Watching. And realising that this is how it has to be.
There's no mention of scale in the following HC Unit schematic, AND THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT.
Space is so big and matter within so small across all the scales:
look at a galaxy, the matter involved is truly tiny
look at an atom, the matter involved is truly tiny
don't go stressing the importance of matter when it is such a small contributor to the overall picture. The upshot of this is that 'matter can not' be both the electromagnetic AND gravitational originator. Quantum and Gravity will never be found from this source.
Forces that are responsible for the biggest structures in our universe MUST be the same as the forces that create the tiniest structures.
something much larger, much more galactic must be going on, and I suspect it happens in the opposite direction to what Modern Physics is looking at it from. It goes something like this, "Forces that can sublimate an atom or a star or the hyper-mass gravitational source at the centres of most galaxies," are THE SAME FORCE. That of hidden vortices and extra-dimensional influence. There is no way a 'particle-led' Big Bang will result in these disparate subatomic/gravity forces. It makes no sense.
What makes more sense is that, "Everything in the universe happens in the same way, at various scales." Matter is a by-product of this. That's all that happened. Stop theorising and dot-watching, Physics, and start Universe Watching. And realising that this is how it has to be.
There's no mention of scale in the following HC Unit schematic, AND THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT.
 |
| no mention of SCALE in the schematic of the HC Unit CW/CCW excess model. |
Comments